[-empyre-] questions
- To: empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au
- Subject: [-empyre-] questions
- From: severn@acay.com.au
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:00:21 +1000 (EST)
- Delivered-to: empyre@gamera.cofa.unsw.edu.au
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <20050617020004.4B161475161@gamera.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
- References: <20050617020004.4B161475161@gamera.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
- Reply-to: soft_skinned_space <empyre@lists.cofa.unsw.edu.au>
- User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-0.f0.9.1.legacy
apologies for my temporal instability, I'm on digest
-------------
this months topic has generated much offlist discussion here regarding the
current trends on the internet and has been stimulating despite the list's
'interesting times'. some questions/observations arising
------------------------------------
'after "duchamp's dunny" (according to artpup) I could do a (dogpoo) in
the corner and call it art. But would it be good art?'
What criteria are applicable in determining what constitutes good or bad
blogart? Are their any special criteria significant to this artform?
--------------------------------------
audience time investment
how much time is the audience willing to spend to access a net artwork,
including time taken to educate about the work?
how accessable is blogging?
--------------------------------------
j
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.